We calculate Forest, Land, and Agriculture (FLAG) related emissions for companies with significant land-use impacts, following SBTi FLAG guidance.
For a food manufacturer, a cotton-based textile brand or a paper company, the largest item in the carbon footprint often comes not from a chimney but from fields, pastures and forests. These are FLAG (Forest, Land and Agriculture) emissions. The SBTi asks companies with significant FLAG emissions to set a FLAG target separate from their energy and industry target, and the GHG Protocol has set out how to account for these emissions in a new standard that takes effect in 2027. Alalëa calculates FLAG inventories, builds SBTi FLAG targets and integrates the work with your corporate carbon inventory in a single data infrastructure. For EU and global buyers sourcing agricultural and forest-based materials from Türkiye, the same work answers the origin and land use questions now reaching suppliers.
According to the SBTi FLAG Guidance, the forest, land and agriculture sector accounts for about 22 percent of net anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (about 13 GtCO2e per year), roughly half from agriculture and half from land use, land use change and forestry. These emissions differ from fossil emissions in two fundamental ways:
FLAG emissions fall into three main groups:
| Group | What it covers | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Land use change (LUC) | Deforestation, conversion of natural ecosystems to agriculture, peatland drainage | Forest cleared for soy or cattle |
| Land management emissions | Enteric fermentation in livestock (CH4), manure management, fertiliser use (N2O), rice cultivation, biomass burning | Methane from dairy cattle, nitrogen fertiliser on cotton fields |
| Land management removals | Agroforestry, silvopastoral systems, forest restoration, soil organic carbon | Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils |
The SBTi does not allow these emissions to be blended into the same target as energy and industry emissions. Under criterion FLAG-C5 of the guidance, FLAG and non-FLAG targets and their accounting must be kept separate.
Under criterion FLAG-C1 of FLAG Guidance 1.2, companies that meet either of two conditions must set a FLAG target.
1. Sectors designated by the SBTi as FLAG sectors:
2. Other companies whose FLAG emissions reach the 20 percent threshold: Companies whose FLAG-related emissions reach 20 percent of total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions must set a FLAG target, whatever their sector. Two details matter. First, the threshold is 20 percent of total emissions, not of Scope 3. Second, it is calculated on gross emissions, so removals are not deducted, and it must include land use change emissions.
The guidance also notes that land-intensive activities can be significant, mostly in Scope 3 Category 1, in the inventories of retail, packaging, hotels and restaurants, textiles (yarn, weaving, apparel), footwear and luxury goods, household and personal care products, tyres, and building products and construction materials.
Exceptions and intermediate cases:
The accounting basis for a FLAG target is the GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard (LSRS). Version 1.0 was published on 30 January 2026, and version 1.1, with corrections that do not change its substance, followed on 30 June 2026. The standard takes effect on 1 January 2027. This version applies to agriculture and CO2 removal technologies; forestry is out of scope and left to a future version.
Key rules of the standard:
According to the SBTi FLAG Guidance, companies may use the draft guidance published in 2022 until the LSRS takes effect on 1 January 2027. Building work that starts today directly on the new standard avoids recalculation in 2027. CDP has also announced plans to align its questionnaire with the LSRS in 2027, so this calculation will be needed for disclosure programmes as well as for SBTi; see our CDP reporting service.
| Criterion | Rule in FLAG Guidance 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Target coverage | At least 95 percent of FLAG-related Scope 1 emissions and at least 67 percent of FLAG-related Scope 3 emissions |
| Target timeframe | At least 5 and at most 10 years from the submission date |
| Pathway options | Sector pathway for companies with diversified FLAG emissions; commodity pathways for 11 commodities |
| Sector pathway rate | 3.03 percent per year; a 30.3 percent reduction for a 10-year target (including emission reductions and removals) |
| Commodity pathway condition | A commodity pathway may be used if that commodity makes up at least 10 percent of the company's total gross FLAG emissions |
| Deforestation commitment | A public commitment no later than 2 years after target submission, with a target date no later than 31 December 2030 |
| Cut-off date | 2020 or earlier recommended; if later, at least 3 years before the first FLAG submission |
The commodity pathways cover beef, chicken, dairy, leather, maize, palm oil, pork, rice, soy, wheat, and timber and wood fibre. Paper and forest products companies, and companies whose timber and wood fibre emissions exceed 10 percent of their FLAG emissions, must use the timber and wood fibre commodity pathway.
The guidance also asks companies to focus primarily on emission reductions: 62 percent of the mitigation potential in the FLAG sector pathway comes from emission reductions, and removals should not be used to lower the level of reduction.
A company setting a FLAG target must publish a no-deforestation commitment covering its main deforestation-linked commodities, and publish how the commitment will be implemented within 12 months of target approval. Under Annex A of the guidance, all commodities the company produces directly are covered; among purchased commodities, cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy and timber are included once they exceed 1 percent of purchased FLAG commodity volume.
These seven commodities also appear in the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). The FLAG Guidance states clearly, however, that the SBTi no-deforestation criterion is separate from legal obligations under the EUDR. In practice both rely on the same origin and traceability data, and collecting it correctly once serves both.
Given Türkiye's export profile, FLAG is closer to home than many companies expect:
Even if these companies do not set SBTi targets themselves, they should expect more requests for origin, land use change and deforestation information from European and global customers that have targets.
Timeline and scope vary widely between companies. The decisive factors are the number and diversity of commodities, the number of countries of origin, how much traceability data suppliers can provide, whether the company produces on its own land, and whether a corporate inventory already exists. Data collection for a retailer using many commodities with weak traceability takes far more effort than for a processor relying on a single main raw material.
Alalëa's founder, Göker Avcı, is an SBTi Certified Expert. We handle the FLAG target together with the SBTi's general criteria, the non-FLAG target and the corporate inventory, because if the split between FLAG and non-FLAG emissions is wrong, both targets will be questioned. We share the foundations of our approach openly: see Scope 3 categories 1 to 15, why SBTi targets are withdrawn and current points in the SBTi process.
To assess your FLAG obligation or update your existing inventory to the LSRS, get in touch with us.
Alalëa guides with formulas, emission factors and worked examples.
Meet with our expert team to discover solutions tailored to your business.
Request a QuoteContact our team to learn how we can help your organization achieve its sustainability goals.
Get in TouchWe use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to use the site, you accept our use of cookies. Privacy Policy